Township school board races

Franklin Township candidate wants the federal government out of local schools

PHOTO: Scott Elliott
Franklin Township High School has been rated an A by the state the past two years.

This is one of 10 school board races in Marion County. Check back with Chalkbeat Indiana throughout the week for more information on the other candidates.


District snapshot

Franklin Township has been the most successful Marion County school district on standardized tests for several years, showing a passing rate of 82.8 percent on last year’s ISTEP. Yet the school also has the fewest poor students in the count, at just 37.9 percent.

Key school district data

  • Enrollment: 8,645 students
  • Ethnicity: 78.6 percent white, 7 percent Hispanic, 5.7 percent black
  • Eligible for free and reduced-price lunch: 38 percent
  • ISTEP math and English passing rate 2014: 82.8 percent
  • 2012-13 graduation rate (most recent available): 95 percent


  • Larry J. Walker, 68, real estate broker, custom home builder and land developer at Timberwood Inc., running for the Southeast District seat.

The following candidates could not be reached or did not respond to the survey questions.

  • Scott Sullivan, running as an at-large candidate.
  • Dawn A. Downer, running for re-election as an at-large candidate.

Why did you choose to run for the school board?

Walker: I grew up in Franklin Township, and still reside in the township. I felt the need to give back to the community that I live and grew up in. With my background of being a self-employed private sector businessman, I feel I have the ability to give input from a different point of view on so many issues addressing the township now and in the near future.

What issues will you focus on?

Walker: Discipline in schools with support of both administrators, teachers and parents working together. Looking at school budget on spending and look for ways to cut without compromising any opportunity for any student and school safety.

What is the most important issue facing your district?

Walker: With exceptions, parents being involved, supporting the administrators and teachers in approaching education. Get federal government out of our local community schools. Get more students and parents involved in the system and the extracurricular activities that go on in the schools.

Anything else about yourself you’d like to share.

Walker: Again, get the federal government out of our daily lives on education and at the same time look for ways to get more tax revenue in our community .

Answers have been edited for length.

Who Is In Charge

Indianapolis Public Schools board gives superintendent Ferebee raise, bonus

PHOTO: Dylan Peers McCoy
Lewis Ferebee

Indianapolis Public Schools Superintendent Lewis Ferebee is getting a $4,701 raise and a bonus of $28,000.

The board voted unanimously to approve both. The raise is a 2.24 percent salary increase. It is retroactive to July 1, 2017. Ferebee’s total pay this year, including the bonus, retirement contributions and a stipend for a car, will be $286,769. Even though the bonus was paid this year, it is based on his performance last school year.

The board approved a new contract Tuesday that includes a raise for teachers.

The bonus is 80 percent of the total — $35,000 — he could have received under his contract. It is based on goals agreed to by the superintendent and the board.

These are performance criteria used to determine the superintendent’s bonus are below:

Student recruitment

How common is it for districts to share student contact info with charter schools? Here’s what we know.

PHOTO: Laura Faith Kebede
Staff members of Green Dot Public Schools canvass a neighborhood near Kirby Middle School in the summer of 2016 before reopening the Memphis school as a charter.

As charter schools emerge alongside local school districts across the nation, student addresses have become a key turf war.

Charter schools have succeeded in filling their classes with and without access to student contact information. But their operators frequently argue that they have a right to such information, which they say is vital to their recruitment efforts and gives families equal access to different schools in their area.

Disputes are underway right now in at least two places: In Tennessee, school boards in Nashville and Memphis are defying a new state law that requires districts to hand over such information to charters that request it. A New York City parent recently filed a formal complaint accusing the city of sharing her information improperly with local charter schools.

How do other cities handle the issue? According to officials from a range of school districts, some share student information freely with charters while others guard it fiercely.

Some districts explicitly do not share student information with charter schools. This includes Detroit, where the schools chief is waging an open war with the charter sector for students; Washington, D.C., where the two school sectors coexist more peacefully; and Los Angeles.

Others have clear rules for student information sharing. Denver, for example, set parameters for what information the district will hand over to charter schools in a formal collaboration agreement — one that Memphis officials frequently cite as a model for one they are creating. Baltimore and Boston also share information, although Boston gives out only some of the personal details that district schools can access.

At least one city has carved out a compromise. In New York City, a third-party company provides mass mailings for charter schools, using contact information provided by the school district. Charter schools do not actually see that information and cannot use it for other purposes — although the provision hasn’t eliminated parent concerns about student privacy and fair recruitment practices there.

In Tennessee, the fight by the state’s two largest districts over the issue is nearing a boiling point. The state education department has already asked a judge to intervene in Nashville and is mulling whether to add the Memphis district to the court filing after the school board there voted to defy the state’s order to share information last month. Nashville’s court hearing is Nov. 28.

The conflict feels high-stakes to some. In Memphis, both local and state districts struggle with enrolling enough students. Most schools in the state-run Achievement School District have lost enrollment this year, and the local district, Shelby County Schools, saw a slight increase in enrollment this year after years of freefall.

Still, some charter leaders wonder why schools can’t get along without the information. One Memphis charter operator said his school fills its classes through word of mouth, Facebook ads, and signs in surrounding neighborhoods.

“We’re fully enrolled just through that,” said the leader, who spoke on condition of anonymity to protect his relationship with the state and local districts. “It’s a non-argument for me.”

A spokeswoman for Green Dot Public Schools, the state-managed charter school whose request for student information started the legal fight in Memphis, said schools in the Achievement School District should receive student contact information because they are supposed to serve students within specific neighborhood boundaries.

“At the end of the day, parents should have the information they need to go to their neighborhood school,” said the spokeswoman, Cynara Lilly. “They deserve to know it’s open.”